Write the rules once
Your team defines the checks in a rule set, in plain language. Nothing about a report’s layout has to be described first.
QC Review is the part of Sentinel you can put to work directly. It reads a report the moment it arrives, checks it against the rules you set, and shows what’s wrong while there’s still time to fix it — instead of after somebody downstream sends it back.
The review is the same on every report, in the same order, with the same rules — which is the part a human review can never quite promise.
Your team defines the checks in a rule set, in plain language. Nothing about a report’s layout has to be described first.
The review starts on upload and runs in the background. Nobody has to remember to trigger it, and nothing sits in a queue waiting for a reviewer to be free.
Every rule in the set is applied to what the report actually says — across the form, the addenda and the attachments, whatever shape they came in.
Each check resolves to Pass, Fail or Inconclusive, with the reasoning behind the call and any comments attached to it.
Blocking items are cleared with a revised report or an acknowledgment. Only then does the report move to the next step.
Every rule resolves to a status of its own, with the reasoning attached. A single blocking item holds the whole report — which is the point.
Nothing to do. When every rule passes, the report moves on without anybody opening it — which is what most reports do.
Blocking. The report pauses, the assigned users are emailed, and the finding comes with the reasoning and the comments behind it rather than a bare error code.
Also blocking, on purpose. A review that guesses when it can’t read something is worse than one that says so, so an unreadable answer gets a human rather than a coin flip.
Two ways to clear a blocking item. Upload a revised report, or acknowledge the finding with an explanation that points the reviewer at the supporting information. Nothing moves forward until every blocking item has had one or the other.
There’s no fixed checklist to adopt. You write the rules your team already argues about in revision emails — against any form and any document — and QC Review applies them to every report the same way, every time.
These rules are applied to reports to ensure quality standards are met.
Include 3 high-quality photos of the kitchen.
Photo analysisComparable sales must have closed within the last 90 days.
If disabled, the rule enters draft mode and won’t apply to any reports.
A demo of QC Review is coming soon. You’ll write up to three rules of your own right here, run a report against exactly those rules, and see what comes back — the same statuses and the same reasoning as a live review.
Include 3 high-quality photos of the kitchen.
Comparable sales must have closed within the last 90 days.
Your rule, in your own words
Your own requirements, in the same plain language the real rule builder takes.
One document, checked against exactly the rules you just wrote and nothing else.
Pass, Fail or Inconclusive per rule, with the reasoning behind each call.
Which side of the report you’re on decides how you get QC Review — and whether it costs you anything.
QC Review comes with your Dwelling Blocks account at no cost. Wherever the lender has turned it on for the report type you’re working on, it runs on your report automatically — nothing to buy, nothing to switch on, no separate login. You upload the way you always have and see the findings before the report goes anywhere.
QC Review is its own application: your rule sets, your reports, your results. Run it across the work you already place, stand it up on its own for an internal QC desk, or call it from the systems you already have.
Every blocking item caught here is a round trip that never happens — no revision email, no second upload days later, no loan waiting on a photo somebody forgot. The review costs seconds. The alternative costs a week, and it lands on whoever is closest to the borrower.