QC Review catches issues before they become revisions
Automated report review, running on every upload against the lender’s own rules. No separate fee, no setup, and nothing to switch on — it is simply part of the platform.
A revision request is a week nobody gets back. A reviewer finds a problem, the report goes back, it gets fixed, the clock restarts — usually over something that could have been caught the moment the report was uploaded.
So we catch it the moment the report is uploaded.
QC Review reads every report as it arrives, checks it against the rules the lender has defined, and shows what is wrong while there is still time to fix it quietly. No queue, no reviewer to wait for, no email from a stranger four days later.
What vendors get out of it
Fewer reports come back. The ones that do come back come back faster, because the finding arrives with the reasoning attached rather than as a rule code you have to decode.
Wherever a lender has switched it on for the report type you are working on, it runs on your upload automatically. There is nothing to buy and nothing to configure: no add-on, no tier to upgrade to, no separate login, and no line item for it on your side. It is part of the platform, and it is priced that way.
It is honest about the trade: a failed check pauses a report you thought was finished, and an unreadable one pauses it too — a review that guesses when it cannot read something is worse than one that says so. You clear it by uploading a correction or by explaining why the flag does not apply, and your explanation travels with the report to the lender. Seconds now, instead of a week later.
The rules are yours to write
Write the checks your team already argues about in revision emails — in plain language, scoped by order type, product or state, each with the message the vendor sees when it fails. Rules that need it read the photos, not just the text around them.
It does not have to run inside Dwelling Blocks
QC Review is its own application, and you do not have to place a single order with us to use it. Any company with documents to check can run it on their own: lenders, AMCs, servicers, an internal QC desk reviewing work that arrives from somewhere else entirely. Your rule sets, your reports, your results.
There are three shapes it takes. Inside the platform, on the work you already place. On its own, against your own documents and standards. Or over the API, called from your LOS, your ordering platform or your own product.
Which one fits depends on where your reports come from and what you already run. That part is a conversation — book a demo and we will go through the options with you.
We are still building it
QC Review gets better every month, and a lot of what goes into it comes from the people using it — a rule that fired when it should not have, a finding that was not clear enough, a check you wish existed. Tell us. If something is not behaving the way you expect, get in touch and we will look at it.